[Nagios-devel] New Nagios dev branch?

Ton Voon ton.voon at opsera.com
Tue Feb 9 11:55:03 UTC 2010

On 9 Feb 2010, at 11:41, Andreas Ericsson wrote:

>> Any feedback? Some people might think there is a lack of development
>> in Nagios :)
> I'm kinda torn on this option. If Nagios is given the option to accept
> check results via a socket rather than from temporary files, there's
> no harm in having the checking daemons sit on a different server, with
> possibly a feeder daemon in between to handle authentication, security
> and multiplexing.

Cheers for the opinion.

This is not about having check results though - that's a completely  
different path of logic because if it was a check result then there's  
other processing like parent-child dependencies/notifications/event  
handlers could be invoked. This patch is about selectively changing or  
adding to existing retention data.

> I'm for it, but I feel it would be redundant with a different fix.

I'm fine with ripping it out afterwards if there is a better way, but  
I'm erring on the side of functionality now rather than in some  
unspecified time in the future.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nagios.com/pipermail/nagios-devel/attachments/20100209/c084444b/attachment.html>

More information about the Nagios-devel mailing list